nsadevil.blogg.se

Deep blue chess self destruction
Deep blue chess self destruction









Ask yourself: as a shareholder, would I support a company that spends millions of dollars to create a game that will not be sold, and a system that has absolutely no return on investment? If so, I have some “cloud computing” applications that I would like to sign you up for.

deep blue chess self destruction

This is akin to the old chess machines where a player would hide in the machine and make the moves. In short, this is fraudulent gameplay, or cheating. The mere fact that IBM would not allow anyone to inspect the logic or the code, then dismantling the machine constitutes a cover up. Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.3.32.205 ( talk) 13:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC) IBM cheats! It is totally unrelated, it explains how the parts of Deep Blue were sold after the event. of Behind Deep Blue by Feng-Hsiung Hsu dosen't mention any cheating accusation. 30 Regarding the deletion of content regarding the element of time.28 Kasparov became visibly upset and even lunged at Deep Blue.24 Please Read the book "Behind Deep Blue".20 How many components, how much parallelism?.16 Modern chess programs play more like a human than deep blue.8 How many flops (tflops) does deep blue run at.











Deep blue chess self destruction